Globalization Effects On Culture Essay Papers

Effects of Globalization on Indian Culture

There are various effects of globalization on Indian culture, experienced in different aspects of the people’s daily lives. Although globalization started way back, it has impacted the cultural beliefs and practices of the people of India in different ways. According to many people, globalization has led to the contamination and erosion of the people’s cultural traditions. However, there are also those who think that globalization is a blessing, which has contributed positively to the development of Indian culture.

The Main Effects of Globalization on the Indian Culture

There have been varied opinions on the effects of globalization on Indian culture. Although it might not be easy to measure the exact impact, there are clear indications that can be seen by a majority. This article will discuss the positive and negative impacts of globalization on the culture of the Indians.

Just like in other nations, the Indian culture is characterized by diverse religions, languages, traditions, foods, art, and architecture among other elements. Over the years, the people of India have been believed to be welcoming and accommodating. This is one of the reasons the country has continued to attract visitors from various parts of the world. As a result of the integration of other cultures, especially Western, the Indian culture is no longer what it used to be. In fact, globalization has affected almost every aspect of the people’s culture.

One of the key areas of the Indian culture that has been affected by globalization is the social values of the people. Before the tide of globalization, Indians treated visitors as God, with a lot of warmth. Besides, elders were accorded high respect in society and the people were so attached to their traditional festivals, which were celebrated in pomp and color. Today, it is quite hard to see such huge social gatherings among Indians. The current generation exercises a lot of restraint and mainly interact based on wealth and financial status. A greater part of their social values has been consumed by other cultures and the cheerful display of togetherness is no longer evident in most cases.

In the traditional Indian society, the main religions were Hinduism, Sikhism, Buddhism and Jainism. The people were not accustomed to religions like Christianity, which is now practiced by many Indians. When British Imperialists came into India, they tried to convince the people that Christianity was the only true religion that all should adopt. Although some Indians have opposed the ideas till today, quite a number of them have abandoned their traditional religions and shifted to Christianity, Islam among others. In fact, the newly converted Indians have not only been able to change their faiths but also a greater part of their cultures. In fact, there is also quite a number of Indians who have totally abandoned the concept of religion.

Through globalization, Indians have been able to access information through the internet and other means of communication. This information has been instrumental in shaping the lifestyles of the people, based on modes of dressing, food, entertainment among others. Indians have their traditional way of dressing which is recognized globally. However, many people today no longer conform to those modes of dressings. The youth are the ones mostly affected by this since many of them today dress according to the fashion trends dictated by the West. In fact, almost every Educated Indian now believes that something can only be presumed fit if it is approved by a Western authority.

The traditional Indian society held the institution of marriage in very high regards and things like divorce were unheard of. In fact, divorce was considered a taboo in the Indian culture, condemned in all manners possible. However, there are several cases of divorce and separation among married couples in India today.

Conclusion on Effects of Globalization on Indian Culture

Considering the effects of globalization on Indian culture discussed above, it is can be concluded that globalization is a double-edged sword that cuts on both sides. To some extent it is a good move, which has opened avenues for new opportunities for growth and development to the people. On the other hand, globalization has also significantly hurt various elements of the people’s cultural beliefs and practices. However, the effects mainly depend on perceptions and the content or ideas that people consume.

In case you may want to continue reading more high quality samples like the one above on effects of globalization on Indian culture, simply visit our blog. Alternatively, you can also check out our homepage for more information.

References

http://www.careerride.com/view.aspx?id=15301

http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=Articles&ArticleID=2458

http://www.civilserviceindia.com/subject/General-Studies/notes/effects-of-globalisation-on-indian-society.html

https://www.quora.com/Why-is-divorce-a-big-taboo-in-India

GLOBALIZATION AND POLITICS: THE EFFECTS OF GLOBALIZATION ON HUMAN LIFE ASPECTS

Mohammad Abo Gazleh

International Conference on Malaysia and Globalization, Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya, 2001.

Abstract:

Globalization has today become a major sort of debate among academicians, policy makers and NGOs. Its impact is profound. Despite the continuing emphasis on promoting global prosperity and achieving a more “just world,” negative aspects of globalization remain rife in our globe. Poverties, inequalities, injustices, starvations, backwards and marginalizations are all serious problems many societies are still experiencing. The purpose of this paper is to examine the positive and negative aspects of globalization and realize how one could successfully deal with the challenge it poses. The study shows that though globalization is a process by which capital, goods, services and labor cross national borders, and acquire a transnational character, it is often accompanied by the flow of related lifestyles, tastes, ideas, and even values across boundaries which help reshape local political institutions, cultural patterns and social relations. It also creates new opportunities for many peoples to increase their wealth and enhance their prosperities. On the other hand, the potential for people of different cultural and religious backgrounds to know and understand one another owing to this process is greater than ever before. Therefore, it is important that one not reject it totally. Instead, as a short and medium-term strategy one should try to inject ethical and moral considerations into some of the dominant economic institutions, activities and goals associated with the process.

Many peoples in this world have hoped that they would enter the 21st century with more equality and less poverty. They thought, with the rapid growth of world economy and the vast development of productive technology associated with the process of globalization terrible features of our globe would be eradicated or remarkably reduced. Many international conferences have been held, a large number of approaches have been adopted, and scores of studies has been produced, but not much has been achieved. In spite of all calls launched here and there to achieve a peaceful and ‘just world,’ negative aspects of globalization remain rife in our globe. There is also a common fear that attempts to create a globalizing ‘modern life’ will involve displacing the poorest and the most powerless societies to make way for ‘new roads and buildings’ for the rich. The problem in fact lies in the sharp differences and inequalities between haves and have-nots. This process in its current features and aspects presents not only a moral crisis, but also the potential for economic disaster and civil unrest in many areas in the world. The purpose of this paper is to examine the process of globalization and to explore its effects on the various aspects of human life.

I. The Concept of Globalization

Globalization is an ambiguous term. It means different things to different people. It may mean different things to the same person. So what does globalization mean? Is it a new stage in human civilization that goes beyond national borders or native cultures? Could it lead to a universal entity within which criteria of race, color, religion, class, language … etc, would disappear? Or is it just another transformation in world economy? Is it a means of dominance or another face of neocolonialism intending to control people’s minds and lifestyles, or to make their future dependent upon the actions and behaviors of market whales and business groups?

With the rise of Japan and Germany as main economic powers in the beginning of 1960s, scholars started to deal with the term as a merely economic phenomenon (Soubbotina & Sheram, 2000). But after the “withering” of Communism and the end of the Cold War, the term becomes the ‘buzzword’ of our time and its meaning remains elusive. It is now no more an economic phenomenon or a merely mental state as perceived during the Cold War, but it transforms into a movement being enhance through concentrating on (a) global common principles such as democracy and human rights, (b) growing interdependence between states, and (c) unprecedented revolution in information technology (Pilger, 2002: 1-5). The quantitative and qualitative effects of this process are seen in many aspects of human life. Within these perspectives, globalization becomes a process of reshaping human life through globalizing certain values which include economic patterns related to free trade, production, consumption and distribution; cultural patterns related to entity, language, and lifestyle; and political patterns related to democratic process and human rights.

II. Instruments of Globalization

There are many instruments by which globalization is being promoted and enhanced. But the most important instruments influencing this process are the multinational corporations and the new revolution of information technology.

1. Multinational corporations are main instruments of globalization. They possess huge capitals and assets. As profit maximizers, they establish their factors in many developing countries where cheap workers and raw materials are found. Because of their size and their contributions to national economies in terms of taxes and employments, they influence decision-making processes in those countries. Once they established, none has the ability to stop them from withdrawing their investments or moving their capitals from country to another whenever it is in their advantage to do so. In spite of their contributions, the given privileges are not without price. Their activities usually leave serious effects on many host economies; they even sometime create civil unrests. This is because these companies control not only markets, but also peoples (Wooldridge and Micklethwait, 2000).
2. New Information Technology, which is a product of the industrial revolution, is another instrument of globalization. Its aspects, in particular the Internet and multimedia, remarkably contribute to the spread of globalization due to their rapidity, easiness and availability. In spite of its huge benefits, the revolution is still possessed and controlled by some advanced nations, which might use it as a means of cultural influence and informational hegemony.

III. Globalization as a Process to Reshaping Human Life

With the end of the Cold War, liberalist nations have become more interested in promoting the free trade principle, where market mechanisms must be dominant, and governments must not interfere in economic activities. The economic and military strengths of these nations assist them to pursue this objective through convincing many other countries to conduct structural changes in their economic, political, cultural and social spheres. As a result, this process has brought profound impacts on the various aspects of human life in many societies, particularly of those involved. Not only it changes many types of lifestyles, but also involves the bridging of temporal, spatial, and cultural distances in new ways, and that these processes tend to be driven by the revolutions in transport technologies, communications, the internationalization of capital notions of the world system, and post industrialism.

In spite of all these changes associated with globalization, a large number of peoples and scholars do not trust this process. Some, who may be described as conservatives, are skeptical about the role of globalization in human life, and view it as a phenomenon which may bring destructive effects on all human beings. Radicalists, on the other hand, argue that the process is not without great benefits to all peoples; its effects may reach all spots of the earth. Still others view this process as any other historical human experience which may have its positive and negative affects. (Yaapar, 2001: 2)

Regardless of these stands, it is wrong to view the process from an economic perspective only because it is increasingly involving political, cultural and technological fields and is remarkably being reinforced by the huge development of communications and information technologies. The significance of these developments does not only lie in the rapid communications or flow of information among peoples, but also in its role in changing the nature of the lives of all social classes, ‘the rich and the poor.’ Therefore, its importance manifests in the fact that its effects are not limited to the ‘macro’ social systems such as economic or financial systems, but exceed that to affect other social sub-systems such as family structures and individual private patterns (Giddens, 2000: 50).

Positive and Negative Affects of Globalization

The previous introduction shows that globalization has both positive and negative effects on the various aspects of human life.

A. Positive Effects of Globalization

There are some positive effects brought with the process of globalization:

1. In the education field, some of the new communication and information technologies, which are of course linked to the globalization process, have enabled students, researchers and young people in distant and to access ideas and information from the best libraries in the world. They are able to peruse through libraries in different countries without having to travel. Globalization from this point of view assists people in the dissemination of values related to knowledge, and in the promotion of values related to health care etc.
2. Globalization has made communication much easier and cheaper than before. The number of subscribers and users of the Internet are now increasing remarkably.
3. The potential for people of different communities, countries, cultures and religions to know and understand one another is greater than ever before. Knowing and understanding each others are very important to promote and establish common values among people of different communities. Globalization also makes it possible for people to demonstrate their sympathy and compassion for the victims of natural calamities and man-made tragedies all over the world regardless of religions, lands, languages, colors, cultures etc. (Muzaffar, 1998: 181-182 )
4. Globalization has also brought to the fore issues such as the rights of women and children.

All these aspects promote globally certain common values such as equality, human rights, justice, democracy and moral values.

B. Negative Effects of Globalization:

While there are some positive aspects of globalization, its negative effects are ‘overwhelming.’ It almost affects all aspects of human life.

1. Globalization and culture: Globalization affects human cultures from various perspectives:

a. Globalization represents a challenge to cultural and local languages. United Nations’ study (Al-Jazeera, 2001) shows that half of local languages in the world are expected to disappear. This could lead unenthusiastically to marginalizing many local cultures. Scientific and economic superiority of the US and the flow of information technology assist in imposing certain languages in particular English as a second language in some developing and developed countries, and as a first language in some others. There is no doubt that language has significant impact on cultures and, therefore, the dominance of English could contribute to the emergence of a global and intercontinental culture which may wipe out traditions, customs, and values of many societies and marginalizes their cultures .
b. Globalization has significant impact on local entities. Its complexity takes decisive dimensions in particular with regard to its effects on labor immigration from the South to the North. In many cases this problem not only has political reflections, but also social dimensions. For example, when the Algerian football player Zaindeen Zaidan has appeared as a star in the French team in World Cup 1998, French Right Wing started to criticize the presence of non-aboriginal French in the national team (Mittelman, 2000: 71). At the same time, Algerians in both France and Algeria were so pleased and looked at Zaidan as an Algerian hero, despite the fact that he was born in France and still resides there. So globalization in this sense is reshaping the identity of many peoples particularly migrants.

2. Globalization and developing countries: Globalization has serious effects on many developing countries:

a. Although developing countries contribute in away or another to this process, yet they do not yield the benefits of this contribution. Indeed, they remain far away from what we might call ‘the impact point’ to influence its truck or contribute to its direction. In contrast, the process destroys many aspects of life in these societies. The irresponsible behavior of some multinational corporations toward the environment of those countries, or more dangerously marketing expired products and other illegal goods are examples of this destruction. So globalization in this context changes the world to become a “global pillage instead of being a global village” (Giddens, 2000: 50).
b. The widening gap between the North and the South at international level, and between haves and have-nots at national level is another serous aspect of globalization. In fact, the real test to globalization is through its success in reducing the gap between the rich and the poor at local, national and global levels.
c. Globalization has forced many countries in various parts of this world to regulate to a lower league the most fundamental needs of their peoples (Muzaffar, 1998: 183). The equitable distribution of food, adequate health care facilities, and the quality of education are no longer priority concerns the political agendas of the governments in these countries.

All these indicate that poor societies in the third world not only remain far away from benefiting from globalization, but also they continue to suffer from its calamities, pitfalls and misfortunes. It then contributes to laying the foundation of injustices and social inequalities, and moreover preventing the growth of new markets in these countries because they are unable to compete with the advanced markets. Here, competitiveness seems to be unequal and its result under all circumstances remains in favor of the strong and those who control international markets. So instead of filling up the gap between the rich and the poor, globalization in its present formula widens this gap (Aulakh, 2000: 123).

3. Globalization and religions: Although globalization might benefit religions through the easier exchange of information and different opinions about these religions, it however represents a source of harm to many religious and spiritual values (Falk, 2001). Globalization, through its cultural and informational aspects and the promotion of consuming patterns and value corruption, challenges religious systems (Aulakh, 2000: 233). In fact, it is gradually replacing these values with pure secular systems within which certain religious values will lose their influence on peoples’ behaviors.

4. Globalization and morals: The immoral character of globalization is becoming even more serious and its negative impacts in this context have different aspects:

a. Globalization has internationalized crimes. Drug trafficking and the trafficking of women and children have become much more difficult to control because of their international character. Not only crimes are globalized, but also disease (Muzaffar, 1998: 186).
b. Another aspect of this problem is that most users of Internet in cyberspaces are adults and they waste a lot of time using the Internet for unnecessary purposes. One of the most dangerous effects of globalization on young people is the immoral usage of the Internet. Studies show that the number of adults and young people who use web sites containing immoral materials are increasing in particular among schools and universities’ students.(Yaapar, 2001: 3)

5. Globalization and international politics: The collapse of the Soviet Union has led to the US control of the global system and international relations. This provides the US with many opportunities to defend its own national interests globally and to challenge international legitimacy through marginalizing the role of the United Nations and ignoring the international law. Power and interests become the main characteristics of interstate interactions.

6. Globalization and economy: Globalization as an economic movement has significant effect on national and global economies. Although many trade blocs were established and many industrial and economic nations have emerged as a response to this process, the rules of this process have contributed to the collapse of many national economies. The emergence of what can be called ‘electronic trade’ though the Internet is another negative aspect of globalization. Piracy is also reinforced by this process.

7. Globalization and science: Although globalization contributes remarkably to new scientific revolutions in many fields including computer and space sciences, these revolutions are accompanied by new sciences that may be used for immoral purposes or to damage the dignity of man whom the Almighty God honors. Example of these sciences is Genetic Engineering Science, which leads to the emergence of Cloning Science.

8. Globalization and societal structures: The free economy and the development of technology have negative impact on laborers. As known, twenty percent of the world population is producing the needs of all population in this world, while most of the rest 80% are unable to find a suitable source of income. This is serous because underprivileged people are expected to revolt against their bad conditions. This is possible with the growing decline of state’s power to the favor of private sectors, on one hand, and to the growing decrease of the governmental expenditures on social and public services such as heath, education etc., on the other (Barlow, 2000: 7). In this, globalization is a source of social instability and class disparity. Figure (1) shows the global strata according to World Capitalist-System theory.

Abbildung in dieser Leseprobe nicht enthalten

Figure (1): Global Strata according to the World Capitalist-System Theory.

9. Globalization, motivated by economic and technologic progress, has also popularized a consumer culture among people due to the flow of goods and products. Since the desire to consume more and more can never really be satisfied, the consumer becomes addicted to shopping to a point where the spiritual, moral and intellectual dimensions of his/her personality do not grow or develop. These are actually due to the business corporations, which produce the wide array of consumer goods and the media, which advertise them. This aspect could eventually create what is called “homogeneous global culture” and, therefore, lead to the decline of diversity and variety among peoples.

10. Globalization and prosperity: Globalization poses serious questions about peace and prosperity: Is there any relationship between the process and peace or prosperity? Could the implementation of free market principle globally enhance international peace and security or prevents wars, as globalists argue? Prosperity, welfare and economic progress which market economy is expected to achieve could enhance or create some opportunities for political stability; but it does not necessarily ensure peace or social stability. It is true that market economy has contributed to social and political stability in liberal states and to peace among them, but it does the opposite in many developing countries. Asian economic crisis of 1997 is a case in point. The free market forces allowed manipulators to control stock markets and to transfer large amount of money just to maximize their profits, while they were destroying the economies of many Asian countries. Indeed these activities have destroyed the social structures of those societies, and furthermore, created what might be called potential social unrests in the region. That is why globalization in its current formula does not necessarily ensure social and political stability, and therefore will not lead to a more peaceful world, particularly if market forces continue to dominate the mechanisms of power without restrictions. There is also no guarantee that economic crises and social unrests will not spread to advanced nations. The largest demonstrations against globalization are usually held in these countries.

All these negative aspects of globalization pose real challenges not only to many developing countries as usually emphasizes, but also to all human beings who should, if they have to manage these problems, inject religious, ethical and moral considerations, activities and objectives associated with the globalization process. Indeed, peoples should globalize themselves within the religious sphere and common values to build a more just world.

CONCLUSION

Globalization emerged as an economic phenomenon in the 1960s. But with the development of communications and the vast technological revolution brought by liberal systems, it has become an extension to the world capitalism, which seeks to create a liberal global community within which liberal values prevail. If we are to reflect upon the credit and debit sides of the process, we would realize that whatever advantages have come out of it, they are to a large extent accompanied with unintended effects of a process the basic motivation of which is the expansion of market economies, the accumulation of wealth and the maximization of profits. While the current mechanisms of globalization provide certain opportunities to achieve technical progresses, and might push toward democracy and political rights, or even open unprecedented ‘horizons’ for the freedom of information, the process, on the other hand, paves the way for injustices and inequalities in the distribution of wealth among and within societies. The most serious effect of this process on human life lies in its role in widening the gap between the poor and the rich, not only at global level, but also at local/national levels. Therefore, injustices and inequalities associated with this process, and its various consequences on societies, religions, cultures, moral systems, and even sciences, could undermine its claim that it is a harbinger of a new age of global solidarity. In contrast, the process in its current formula could destroy the social systems of less power societies and threaten the future of human civilization. However, and regardless of our attitudes toward globalization, it is our moral responsibility, as proponents or opponents; individuals or groups; NGOs or governments, to rethink the process of globalization in a manner that enhances its advantages and reduces or eradicates its negatives.

REFERENCES

Aulakh, Preet S. and Schechter, Michael G. eds. (2000). Rethinking Globalization (S) From

Corporate Transnationalism to Local Interventions. (International Political Economy Series). London: Michelman.

Barlow, Maude. (2000). Forging a Moral Alternative to Global Corporate Rule. Catholic New Times, 24 June: 7.

Camilleri, Joseph A. and Muzaffar, Chandra, eds. (1998). Globalization: The Perspectives and

Experiences of the Religious Traditions of Asia Pacific. Kuala Lumpur: International Movement for a Just World.

Falk, Richard. (2001). Religion and Humane Global Governance. New York:Palgrave.

Giddens, Anthony. (2000). Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives. London: Profile Books.

Mittelman, James H. (2000). The Globalization Syndrome: Transformation and Resistance. New York: Princeton University Press.

Muzaffar, Chandra. (1998). Globalization and Religion: Some Reflections, in Globalization: The

Perspectives and Experiences of the Religious Traditions of Asia Pacific. (Camilleri, and Muzaffar, eds), pp. 179-190. Kuala Lumpur, PJ: International Movement for a Just World.

Muzaffar, Chandra. (1997). Cultures Under Attacks. In ISIS Focus. Kula Lumpur: Institute of Strategic and International Studies.

Pilger, John. (2002). The New Rulers of the World. London: Verso.

Soubbotina, Tatyana P and Sheram, Katherine. (2000). Beyond Economic Growth: Meeting the Challenges of Global Development. New York: World Bank.

Wooldridge, Adrian and Micklethwait, John. (2000). A Future Perfect: The Challenge and Hidden Promise of Globalization. London: William Haniman.

Yaaper, Salleh. (2001). The Impact of Globalization on Muslim Values and Culture. Penang: Al-Hikmah- University Science Malaysia, July: 9: 1-6.

Al Jazeera www.aljazeera.net accessed on 10 February, 2001.

19 of 18 pages - scroll top

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *